Filed: Jul. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6560 CLINTON R. POWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DANA Y. KINSLEY, GRCC Law Library Supervisor; RONALD ABERNATHY, GRCC Food Operations Manager; BENJAMIN WRIGHT, GRCC Lead Warden; JIMMY EVERETTE, GRCC Administrative Staff Specialist, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:12-cv-00372-RBS-DEM) Submitte
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6560 CLINTON R. POWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DANA Y. KINSLEY, GRCC Law Library Supervisor; RONALD ABERNATHY, GRCC Food Operations Manager; BENJAMIN WRIGHT, GRCC Lead Warden; JIMMY EVERETTE, GRCC Administrative Staff Specialist, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:12-cv-00372-RBS-DEM) Submitted..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6560
CLINTON R. POWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DANA Y. KINSLEY, GRCC Law Library Supervisor; RONALD
ABERNATHY, GRCC Food Operations Manager; BENJAMIN WRIGHT,
GRCC Lead Warden; JIMMY EVERETTE, GRCC Administrative Staff
Specialist,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:12-cv-00372-RBS-DEM)
Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 29, 2014
Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clinton R. Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, Lara
Kate Jacobs Todd, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,
Richmond, Virginia; Daniel James Kelly, MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP,
Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clinton R. Powell appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Powell v. Kinsley, No. 2:12-cv-00372-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va.
Mar. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2