Filed: Sep. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6622 BILLY TEDDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SERGEANT JOHNSON, Defendant – Appellee, and MARGRETT BELL, Associate Warden of Security; WARDEN ANTHONY PADULA; DIRECTOR JOHN OZMINT, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (8:09-cv-03067-JMC) Submitted: September 16, 2014 Decided: Septe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6622 BILLY TEDDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SERGEANT JOHNSON, Defendant – Appellee, and MARGRETT BELL, Associate Warden of Security; WARDEN ANTHONY PADULA; DIRECTOR JOHN OZMINT, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (8:09-cv-03067-JMC) Submitted: September 16, 2014 Decided: Septem..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6622
BILLY TEDDER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT JOHNSON,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
MARGRETT BELL, Associate Warden of Security; WARDEN ANTHONY
PADULA; DIRECTOR JOHN OZMINT, South Carolina Department of
Corrections,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (8:09-cv-03067-JMC)
Submitted: September 16, 2014 Decided: September 29, 2014
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, WYNN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy Joe Tedder, Appellant Pro Se. Walker Heinitsh Willcox,
WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Billy Joe Tedder appeals the district court’s judgment
entered after a jury found for the defendant on Tedder’s 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint in which he alleged excessive
force. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Tedder’s motion for the
preparation of a transcript at government expense, and his
motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3