Filed: Sep. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6662 CALVIN L. GADDY, a/k/a Calvin Lyndale Gaddy, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MR. ROBERT WARD; MRS. ANN HALLMAN; WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE; AMY MACHANN, FSS#; ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees, and DONALD ALTMAN, Perry C.I., SCDC #261468, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:12-cv-03549-JFA) Submitted:
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6662 CALVIN L. GADDY, a/k/a Calvin Lyndale Gaddy, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MR. ROBERT WARD; MRS. ANN HALLMAN; WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE; AMY MACHANN, FSS#; ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees, and DONALD ALTMAN, Perry C.I., SCDC #261468, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:12-cv-03549-JFA) Submitted: A..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6662
CALVIN L. GADDY, a/k/a Calvin Lyndale Gaddy,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MR. ROBERT WARD; MRS. ANN HALLMAN; WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE;
AMY MACHANN, FSS#; ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DONALD ALTMAN, Perry C.I., SCDC #261468,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (8:12-cv-03549-JFA)
Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 3, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Calvin L. Gaddy, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt,
MCDONALD, PATRICK, POSTON, HEMPHILL & ROPER, LLC, Greenwood,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Calvin Lyndale Gaddy appeals the district court’s
orders adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
and granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and denying reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Gaddy v. Ward, No. 8:12-cv-03549-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 18,
2014; Apr. 28, 2014). We deny Gaddy’s petition for an
extraordinary writ. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3