Filed: Sep. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6807 KENNETH BRYANT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MARIE VARGO, Warden; TERRA MOORE, Medical Administrator; S. HICKS, Registered Nurse; CORIZON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-00294-CMH-TCB) Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6807 KENNETH BRYANT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MARIE VARGO, Warden; TERRA MOORE, Medical Administrator; S. HICKS, Registered Nurse; CORIZON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-00294-CMH-TCB) Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges,..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6807
KENNETH BRYANT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MARIE VARGO, Warden; TERRA MOORE, Medical Administrator;
S. HICKS, Registered Nurse; CORIZON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00294-CMH-TCB)
Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Bryant appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint for failure to notify the court of his change of
address. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541,
545-46 (1949). Because Bryant may proceed with his claims by
filing another complaint and providing an accurate address, the
order he seeks to appeal is neither a final order with respect
to those claims nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral
order. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,
10
F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2