Filed: Sep. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6829 JOHN MARVIN BALLARD Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JUSTIN ANDREWS; UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; W. ELLIS BOYLE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:13-ct-03073-H) Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6829 JOHN MARVIN BALLARD Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JUSTIN ANDREWS; UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; W. ELLIS BOYLE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:13-ct-03073-H) Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit J..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6829
JOHN MARVIN BALLARD
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JUSTIN ANDREWS; UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; WAKE COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; W. ELLIS BOYLE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:13-ct-03073-H)
Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Marvin Ballard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Marvin Ballard appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971),
after a review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although
we grant Ballard’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm the district court’s judgment. Ballard v. Andrews, No.
5:13-ct-03073-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2