Filed: Nov. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7023 DOUGLAS THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAPTAIN KELLEY; LIEUTENANT HARRIET, Defendants - Appellees, and TURBEVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, SCDC; INMATE JAMES PILGRIM, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (0:12-cv-02220-CMC) Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 25, 2014 Before KING and KEE
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7023 DOUGLAS THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAPTAIN KELLEY; LIEUTENANT HARRIET, Defendants - Appellees, and TURBEVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, SCDC; INMATE JAMES PILGRIM, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (0:12-cv-02220-CMC) Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 25, 2014 Before KING and KEEN..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7023
DOUGLAS THOMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAPTAIN KELLEY; LIEUTENANT HARRIET,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
TURBEVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, SCDC; INMATE JAMES
PILGRIM,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
District Judge. (0:12-cv-02220-CMC)
Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 25, 2014
Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Walker Heinitsh Willcox,
WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Douglas Thompson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint and reopen his case. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Thompson v. Kelley, No.
0:12-cv-02220-CMC (D.S.C. June 3, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2