Filed: Sep. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7028 LIONELL E. EPHRAIM, a/k/a Lionel E. Williams, Petitioner - Appellant, v. KAREN F. HOGSTEN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-02339) Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 26, 2014 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Aff
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7028 LIONELL E. EPHRAIM, a/k/a Lionel E. Williams, Petitioner - Appellant, v. KAREN F. HOGSTEN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-02339) Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 26, 2014 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7028
LIONELL E. EPHRAIM, a/k/a Lionel E. Williams,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
KAREN F. HOGSTEN, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-02339)
Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 26, 2014
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lionell Elijah Ephraim, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lionell Elijah Ephraim appeals the district court’s
orders adopting the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation, denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and
denying his Rule 59 motion of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, while we grant Ephraim leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Ephraim v. Hogsten, No. 1:12-cv-02339 (S.D.W. Va. Apr.
4, 2014; June 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2