Filed: Dec. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7174 ALEXANDER HEWATT SHEPARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MIKE SLAGLE, Asst. Superintendent of Programs; DR. ROBERT UHREN, Inmate Medical Provider; ELLEN WILEY, Medical Services Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (1:14-cv-00030-FDW) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7174 ALEXANDER HEWATT SHEPARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MIKE SLAGLE, Asst. Superintendent of Programs; DR. ROBERT UHREN, Inmate Medical Provider; ELLEN WILEY, Medical Services Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (1:14-cv-00030-FDW) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7174
ALEXANDER HEWATT SHEPARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MIKE SLAGLE, Asst. Superintendent of Programs; DR. ROBERT
UHREN, Inmate Medical Provider; ELLEN WILEY, Medical
Services Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (1:14-cv-00030-FDW)
Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Hewatt Shepard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alexander Hewatt Shepard appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Shepard v. Slagle, No. 1:14-cv-00030-FDW (W.D.N.C. July
7, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2