Filed: Dec. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7175 KELVIN A. CANADA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RANDALL MATHENA, Warden; LIEUTENANT ANTHONY MULLINS; LIEUTENANT STILL; SERGEANT J. KISER; LIEUTENANT STEVE FRANKLIN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:13-cv-00322-JPJ-PMS) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKE
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7175 KELVIN A. CANADA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RANDALL MATHENA, Warden; LIEUTENANT ANTHONY MULLINS; LIEUTENANT STILL; SERGEANT J. KISER; LIEUTENANT STEVE FRANKLIN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:13-cv-00322-JPJ-PMS) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7175
KELVIN A. CANADA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RANDALL MATHENA, Warden; LIEUTENANT ANTHONY MULLINS;
LIEUTENANT STILL; SERGEANT J. KISER; LIEUTENANT STEVE
FRANKLIN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District
Judge. (7:13-cv-00322-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelvin A. Canada, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis,
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kelvin A. Canada appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Canada
v. Mathena, No. 7:13-cv-00322-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. July 29, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2