FULLER v. STOUFFER, 13-7379. (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20140205080
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Kevin Fuller appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fuller v. Stouffer, No. 8:12-cv-02914-AW (D. Md. July 1 & July 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in t
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Kevin Fuller appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fuller v. Stouffer, No. 8:12-cv-02914-AW (D. Md. July 1 & July 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in th..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Kevin Fuller appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fuller v. Stouffer, No. 8:12-cv-02914-AW (D. Md. July 1 & July 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
