Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STRAUCH v. EXELON CORPORATION, 13-2464. (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: infco20140409108 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. John J. Strauch, Jr., and Jason Endlich appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment to Exelon Corporation and Constellation Energy Group's Severance Plan. We have reviewed the record de novo and the district court's memorandum opinion and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Strauch v. Exelon, No. 1:13-cv-01543-JKB (D. Md. Nov. 19, 2013). We also conclude that the di
More

UNPUBLISHED

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

John J. Strauch, Jr., and Jason Endlich appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment to Exelon Corporation and Constellation Energy Group's Severance Plan. We have reviewed the record de novo and the district court's memorandum opinion and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Strauch v. Exelon, No. 1:13-cv-01543-JKB (D. Md. Nov. 19, 2013). We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for discovery. See Erdmann v. Preferred Research, Inc., 852 F.2d 788, 792 (4th Cir. 1988) (stating standard of review). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer