RUFF v. BOWERS, 14-1177. (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20140528135
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 28, 2014
Latest Update: May 28, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Walter Clayton Ruff, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruff v. Bowers, No. 8:12-cv-03522-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 19, 2014). We further deny Ruff's motion for appoint
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Walter Clayton Ruff, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruff v. Bowers, No. 8:12-cv-03522-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 19, 2014). We further deny Ruff's motion for appointm..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Walter Clayton Ruff, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruff v. Bowers, No. 8:12-cv-03522-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 19, 2014). We further deny Ruff's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
