ALFORD v. MABUS, 14-1047. (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20140609044
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 09, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Carlos A. Alford seeks to appeal the district court's order remanding this case to the Board for Correction of Naval Records. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545-46 (1949). The order Alford seeks to a
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Carlos A. Alford seeks to appeal the district court's order remanding this case to the Board for Correction of Naval Records. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545-46 (1949). The order Alford seeks to ap..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Carlos A. Alford seeks to appeal the district court's order remanding this case to the Board for Correction of Naval Records. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Alford seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
