SCHAFLER v. HSBC BANK USA, 14-1509. (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20140825091
Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Pepi Schafler appeals the district court's order entering judgment on a pending writ of garnishment on two of Schafler's bank accounts to satisfy a judgment of attorney's fees and costs against her. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in t
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Pepi Schafler appeals the district court's order entering judgment on a pending writ of garnishment on two of Schafler's bank accounts to satisfy a judgment of attorney's fees and costs against her. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in th..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Pepi Schafler appeals the district court's order entering judgment on a pending writ of garnishment on two of Schafler's bank accounts to satisfy a judgment of attorney's fees and costs against her. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
