U.S. v. CLIFTON, 14-6755. (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20140930158
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Mark Clifton appeals the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and his supplemental petition alternatively seeking relief pursuant to a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Clifton, No. 7:96-cr-00062-H-2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2014). We disp
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Mark Clifton appeals the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and his supplemental petition alternatively seeking relief pursuant to a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Clifton, No. 7:96-cr-00062-H-2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2014). We dispe..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Mark Clifton appeals the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and his supplemental petition alternatively seeking relief pursuant to a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Clifton, No. 7:96-cr-00062-H-2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
