LITTLE v. HOOK TIRE & SERVICE, INC., 14-1341. (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20141023227
Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Michael Little appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings in Little's action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record, the briefs filed by the parties, and the district court's order, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Michael Little appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings in Little's action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record, the briefs filed by the parties, and the district court's order, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Michael Little appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings in Little's action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record, the briefs filed by the parties, and the district court's order, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Little v. Hook Tire & Serv., Inc., No. 3:13-cv-00521-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
