CHARNOCK v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, 14-1888. (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20141218131
Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Douglas C. Charnock, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for injunctive relief and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Charnock v. Virginia, No. 2:14-cv-00229-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. July 29, 2014). We also deny Charnock's motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with ora
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Douglas C. Charnock, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for injunctive relief and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Charnock v. Virginia, No. 2:14-cv-00229-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. July 29, 2014). We also deny Charnock's motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Douglas C. Charnock, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for injunctive relief and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Charnock v. Virginia, No. 2:14-cv-00229-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. July 29, 2014). We also deny Charnock's motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
