U.S. v. COPPEDGE, 14-7293. (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20141223157
Visitors: 32
Filed: Dec. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Donnell Coppedge appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a new sentencing hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coppedge , No. 4:09-cr-00054-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Donnell Coppedge appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a new sentencing hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coppedge , No. 4:09-cr-00054-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the m..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Donnell Coppedge appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a new sentencing hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coppedge, No. 4:09-cr-00054-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
