Filed: May 06, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7761 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DWAYNE ALEX MCCASKEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (2:10-cr-00016-BO-2; 2:12-cv-00082-BO) Submitted: May 1, 2015 Decided: May 6, 2015 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dwayne
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7761 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DWAYNE ALEX MCCASKEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (2:10-cr-00016-BO-2; 2:12-cv-00082-BO) Submitted: May 1, 2015 Decided: May 6, 2015 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dwayne A..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7761
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DWAYNE ALEX MCCASKEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W.
Boyle, District Judge. (2:10-cr-00016-BO-2; 2:12-cv-00082-BO)
Submitted: May 1, 2015 Decided: May 6, 2015
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwayne Alex McCaskey, Appellant Pro Se. Shailika S. Kotiya,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dwayne Alex McCaskey appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States
v. McCaskey, No. 2:10-cr-00016-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 15, 2013);
see also United States v. Foote, __ F.3d __,
2015 WL 18883538
(4th Cir. Apr. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2