Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nancy Schmitt-Doss v. American Regent, Inc., 14-1891 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-1891 Visitors: 50
Filed: Apr. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1891 NANCY A. SCHMITT-DOSS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMERICAN REGENT, INC.; LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendants – Appellees, and DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LTD OF JAPAN, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:12-cv-00040-NKM-RSB) Submitted: March 24, 2015 Decided: April 1, 2015 Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Cir
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1891 NANCY A. SCHMITT-DOSS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMERICAN REGENT, INC.; LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendants – Appellees, and DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LTD OF JAPAN, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:12-cv-00040-NKM-RSB) Submitted: March 24, 2015 Decided: April 1, 2015 Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nancy A. Schmitt-Doss, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Douglas Loftis, WOODS ROGERS, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nancy A. Schmitt-Doss appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants on her complaint seeking damages for personal injuries under Virginia tort law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schmitt-Doss v. Am. Regent, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00040-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 5, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer