Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Teletia Taylor v. Oak Forest Health and Rehab, 14-1992 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-1992 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1992 TELETIA TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OAK FOREST HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, LLC; ARDENT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CO; BEYSTONE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CO; SANSTONE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION; UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, d/b/a United Healthcare Insurance Company, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1992 TELETIA TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OAK FOREST HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, LLC; ARDENT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CO; BEYSTONE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CO; SANSTONE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION; UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, d/b/a United Healthcare Insurance Company, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00471-CCE-LPA) Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 26, 2015 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Teletia Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick McQuillan Aul, Matthew Justin Gray, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Daniel Alter, Shari Gerson, Jeffrey T. Kuntz, GARYROBINSON, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Donald Joseph O’Brien, III, Jennifer Kay Van Zant, BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Teletia Taylor appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint as a sanction for her failures to comply with court orders. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Oak Forest Health & Rehab., LLC, No. 1:11-cv-00471-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer