Filed: Mar. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2025 DEBRA FEASTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:13-cv-02517-DCN) Submitted: March 24, 2015 Decided: March 31, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Debra Feaster, Appellant Pro Se. Luci
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2025 DEBRA FEASTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:13-cv-02517-DCN) Submitted: March 24, 2015 Decided: March 31, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Debra Feaster, Appellant Pro Se. Lucil..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2025
DEBRA FEASTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(2:13-cv-02517-DCN)
Submitted: March 24, 2015 Decided: March 31, 2015
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Debra Feaster, Appellant Pro Se. Lucille Lattimore Nelson,
OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charleston, South
Carolina; Patrick Daniel Riederer, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,
Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Debra Feaster appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary
judgment to Federal Express Corporation on her claims of a
hostile work environment and discrimination, in violation of 42
U.S.C. § 1981 (2012), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2012), and Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Feaster v. Fed. Express
Corp., No. 2:13-cv-02517-DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2