Filed: Mar. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2054 ESCGOV, INC., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BMC SOFTWARE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01344-GBL-TCB) Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 16, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher A. Abel, Stephani
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2054 ESCGOV, INC., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BMC SOFTWARE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01344-GBL-TCB) Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 16, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher A. Abel, Stephanie..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2054
ESCGOV, INC.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BMC SOFTWARE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01344-GBL-TCB)
Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 16, 2015
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher A. Abel, Stephanie N. Gilbert, D. Sutton Hirschler,
III, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant.
Benjamin G. Chew, Nigel L. Wilkinson, Joshua N. Drian, MANATT,
PHELPS & PHILLIPS LLP, Washington, D.C.; T. Michael Guiffré,
SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
ESCgov, Inc., appeals from the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of BMC Software, Inc., on its
claims for breach of contract, tortious interference with a
contract, civil conspiracy, and statutory conspiracy. We have
reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, and we
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See ESCgov, Inc. v. BMC
Software, Inc., No. 1:13-cv-1344,
2014 WL 3891660 (E.D. Va. Aug.
7, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2