Filed: Mar. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2094 COURTNAY T. BRISSETT; LADWIN BRISSETT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CRAVEN COUNTY; CITY OF NEW BERN; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, P.A.; WARD AND SMITH, P.A., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (4:14-cv-00179-D) Submitted: February 2
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2094 COURTNAY T. BRISSETT; LADWIN BRISSETT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CRAVEN COUNTY; CITY OF NEW BERN; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, P.A.; WARD AND SMITH, P.A., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (4:14-cv-00179-D) Submitted: February 25..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2094
COURTNAY T. BRISSETT; LADWIN BRISSETT,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
CRAVEN COUNTY; CITY OF NEW BERN; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY; SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART,
P.A.; WARD AND SMITH, P.A.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (4:14-cv-00179-D)
Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 3, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Courtnay T. Brissett; Ladwin Brissett, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Courtnay T. and Ladwin Brissett appeal the district
court’s order dismissing their civil action under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Brissett v. Craven Cnty., No. 4:14-cv-
00179-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2014). We deny the Brissetts’
motion for injunctive relief pending appeal and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2