Filed: Apr. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2298 DONALD VAN METER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JM & LF INC., d/b/a Action Automotive, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Theresa C. Buchanan, Magistrate Judge. (1:14-cv-01074-LMB-TCB) Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015 Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per c
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2298 DONALD VAN METER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JM & LF INC., d/b/a Action Automotive, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Theresa C. Buchanan, Magistrate Judge. (1:14-cv-01074-LMB-TCB) Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015 Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per cu..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2298
DONALD VAN METER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JM & LF INC., d/b/a Action Automotive,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Theresa C. Buchanan,
Magistrate Judge. (1:14-cv-01074-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Van Meter, Appellant Pro Se. William Edward Hassan,
Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Donald Van Meter seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
order granting the Defendant’s motion to set aside default
judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-
46 (1949). The order Van Meter seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Nor could it have been certified for immediate appealability
under Rule 54(b). In re Bryson,
406 F.3d 284, 287-88 (4th Cir.
2005); Equip. Fin. Grp., Inc. v. Traverse Computer Brokers,
973
F.2d 345, 347-48 (4th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2