Filed: Jun. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2301 ANNE MELCHOR BREMUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMR CORPORATION; AMERICAN AIRLINES, INCORPORATED; AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:12-cv-00100-RBS-LRL) Submitted: May 29, 2015 Decided: June 16, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Af
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2301 ANNE MELCHOR BREMUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMR CORPORATION; AMERICAN AIRLINES, INCORPORATED; AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:12-cv-00100-RBS-LRL) Submitted: May 29, 2015 Decided: June 16, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Aff..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2301
ANNE MELCHOR BREMUS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AMR CORPORATION; AMERICAN AIRLINES, INCORPORATED; AMERICAN
EAGLE AIRLINES, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:12-cv-00100-RBS-LRL)
Submitted: May 29, 2015 Decided: June 16, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John B. Mann, JOHN B. MANN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellant. Daniel E. Farrington, THE FARRINGTON LAW FIRM, LLC,
Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anne Melchor Bremus appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) motion for judgment
on the pleadings on Bremus’s discrimination and retaliation
claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights of
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). Bremus
has filed a motion for leave to file materials as an attachment
to her opening brief, and Defendants have filed a motion for
leave to file a supplemental appendix. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant the
parties’ pending motions and affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Bremus v. AMR Corp., No. 2:12-cv-00100-RBS-
LRL (E.D. Va. Nov. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
