Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Karin Zander v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc., 14-2320 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-2320 Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2320 KARIN KIRKSEY ZANDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.; OCWEN FINANCIAL CORP., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:13-cv-01141-WO-JEP) Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2320 KARIN KIRKSEY ZANDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.; OCWEN FINANCIAL CORP., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:13-cv-01141-WO-JEP) Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karin Kirksey Zander, Appellant Pro Se. Cassandra Lauren Crawford, Donald Richard Pocock, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Dennis Kyle Deak, Whitney Sarah Waldenberg, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Karin Kirksey Zander appeals from district court’s orders: (1) dismissing her civil action asserting claims pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act and remanding her state law claims, (2) denying her motion for default judgment, and (3) denying her motions to amend the complaint and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Zander v. Saxon Mortg. Servs., Inc., No. 1:13-cv-01141-WO-JEP (M.D.N.C. Aug. 26, 2014; Nov. 5, 2014; Nov. 6, 2014) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer