Filed: Apr. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2394 JESSE G. YATES, III; MELISSA LONG YATES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JULIE GARRISON, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC) Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jess
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2394 JESSE G. YATES, III; MELISSA LONG YATES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JULIE GARRISON, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC) Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jesse..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2394
JESSE G. YATES, III; MELISSA LONG YATES,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
JULIE GARRISON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC)
Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jesse G. Yates, III, Melissa Long Yates, Appellants Pro Se.
Richard Caldarone, Joan Iris Oppenheimer, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jesse G. Yates, III, and Melissa Long Yates appeal the
district court’s order denying relief on their complaint filed
pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971) and related claims. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yates
v. Garrison, No. 5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2014).
We deny the Yateses’ motion to strike the informal response
brief and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2