Filed: May 01, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6149 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LORENZO RUDY WILDER, a/k/a Dolo, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:09-cr-00207-FL-1; 5:11-cv-00771-FL) Submitted: April 24, 2015 Decided: May 1, 2015 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6149 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LORENZO RUDY WILDER, a/k/a Dolo, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:09-cr-00207-FL-1; 5:11-cv-00771-FL) Submitted: April 24, 2015 Decided: May 1, 2015 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6149
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LORENZO RUDY WILDER, a/k/a Dolo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:09-cr-00207-FL-1; 5:11-cv-00771-FL)
Submitted: April 24, 2015 Decided: May 1, 2015
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lorenzo Rudy Wilder, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Assistant United States Attorney, Eric David Goulian, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lorenzo Rudy Wilder appeals the district court’s order
accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(2012) and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Wilder, Nos. 5:09-cr-00207-FL-1; 5:11-cv-00771-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan.
21, 2014). We deny Wilder’s motions to appoint counsel and to
seal his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2