Filed: Feb. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7475 ADRIAN NATHANIEL BACON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. ROSE, Defendant – Appellee, and PAUL PAYNE; J. MCQUINN, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:13-cv-00350-JPJ-PMS) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19, 2015 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7475 ADRIAN NATHANIEL BACON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. ROSE, Defendant – Appellee, and PAUL PAYNE; J. MCQUINN, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:13-cv-00350-JPJ-PMS) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19, 2015 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7475
ADRIAN NATHANIEL BACON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. ROSE,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
PAUL PAYNE; J. MCQUINN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District
Judge. (7:13-cv-00350-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adrian Nathaniel Bacon, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Adrian Nathaniel Bacon appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for appointment of counsel and the
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and denying relief on Bacon’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny Bacon’s pending motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Bacon v. Rose, No. 7:13-cv-00350-JPJ-PMS (W.D.
Va. May 1, 2014; Sept. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2