Filed: Mar. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7483 CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALETA BARIE, Clerk of Court, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-22649) Submitted: March 12, 2015 Decided: March 16, 2015 Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher L. Harri
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7483 CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALETA BARIE, Clerk of Court, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-22649) Submitted: March 12, 2015 Decided: March 16, 2015 Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher L. Harris..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7483
CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALETA BARIE, Clerk of Court,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:13-cv-22649)
Submitted: March 12, 2015 Decided: March 16, 2015
Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher L. Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher L. Harris appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
his motion for leave to make a deposit in court pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2014 (2012), and denying his motion for
reconsideration. Harris sought to pay a criminal fine imposed
by the district court in Indiana with a promissory note. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Harris’ pending motions and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Barie, No.
1:13-cv-22649 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 15, 2014; Oct. 7, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2