Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ronnie Noel v. Lieutenant Colonel Kumer, 14-7520 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-7520 Visitors: 28
Filed: Mar. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7520 RONNIE A. NOEL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT COLONEL KUMER; ROSETTA BOWLES; MEDICAL DIRECTOR, Defendants – Appellees, and PAYTEL PHONE SYSTEM; DENISE Y. LUNFORD, Commonwealth Attorney; WILLIAM KAVANAH, Arresting Officer; JAMES HINGELEY, Supervisor, Albemarle Public Defender's Office; VOPA, VIRGINIA OFFICE OF PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Distri
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7520 RONNIE A. NOEL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT COLONEL KUMER; ROSETTA BOWLES; MEDICAL DIRECTOR, Defendants – Appellees, and PAYTEL PHONE SYSTEM; DENISE Y. LUNFORD, Commonwealth Attorney; WILLIAM KAVANAH, Arresting Officer; JAMES HINGELEY, Supervisor, Albemarle Public Defender's Office; VOPA, VIRGINIA OFFICE OF PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:14-cv-00200-GEC-RSB) Submitted: February 24, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie A. Noel, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY LAW FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Ronnie A. Noel appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction, denying as moot his motion for appointment of specialists, granting the motion to dismiss claims against Lt. Col. Kumer and Rosetta Bowles, and dismissing without prejudice claims against the Medical Director of the Albemarle-Charlottesville Regional Jail. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Noel v. Lt. Col. Kumer, No. 7:14-cv-00200-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer