Filed: Mar. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7604 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. FRED BLOUNT, III, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:95-cr-00138-MSD-1) Submitted: March 9, 2015 Decided: March 17, 2015 Amended: March 17, 2015 Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7604 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. FRED BLOUNT, III, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:95-cr-00138-MSD-1) Submitted: March 9, 2015 Decided: March 17, 2015 Amended: March 17, 2015 Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per c..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7604
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
FRED BLOUNT, III,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:95-cr-00138-MSD-1)
Submitted: March 9, 2015 Decided: March 17, 2015
Amended: March 17, 2015
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fred Blount, III, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Fred Blount, III, appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction
of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Blount, No. 2:95-cr-00138-MSD-
1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2