Filed: Mar. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7664 PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL, Aboriginal Republic of North America Larnad Aboriginal Minister, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JUDGE MARY COVINGTON; PAT MCCRORY; ROY COOPER; ATTORNEY GENERAL IRVIN NATHAN, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00756-TDS-LPA) Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided:
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7664 PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL, Aboriginal Republic of North America Larnad Aboriginal Minister, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JUDGE MARY COVINGTON; PAT MCCRORY; ROY COOPER; ATTORNEY GENERAL IRVIN NATHAN, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00756-TDS-LPA) Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7664
PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL, Aboriginal Republic of North
America Larnad Aboriginal Minister,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JUDGE MARY COVINGTON; PAT MCCRORY; ROY COOPER; ATTORNEY
GENERAL IRVIN NATHAN,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00756-TDS-LPA)
Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peace Elluvasun Allah Cush-El, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Peace Elluvasun Allah Cush-El appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Cush-El v. Covington, No. 1:14-cv-00756-TDS-LPA
(M.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2