Filed: Mar. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7727 BRANDON L. ROBERTSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MATTHEW ROBERTS, Correctional Officer (K-9 Unit); BRETT HUGHES, Supervising Officer (Sergeant), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (7:13-cv-00560-MFU-RSB) Submitted: March 13, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015 Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HA
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7727 BRANDON L. ROBERTSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MATTHEW ROBERTS, Correctional Officer (K-9 Unit); BRETT HUGHES, Supervising Officer (Sergeant), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (7:13-cv-00560-MFU-RSB) Submitted: March 13, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015 Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAM..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7727
BRANDON L. ROBERTSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MATTHEW ROBERTS, Correctional Officer (K-9 Unit); BRETT
HUGHES, Supervising Officer (Sergeant),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:13-cv-00560-MFU-RSB)
Submitted: March 13, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandon L. Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Brandon L. Robertson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Robertson v. Roberts, No. 7:13-cv-00560-MFU-RSB (W.D.
Va. July 7, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2