Filed: Jun. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7785 ALONZO GREENE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, sued in individual and official capacity; R. C. SWARTZ, Durham County police officer sued in individual and official capacity; JOHN DOE, #1(DPO), Police Investigator, sued in individual and official capacity; JOHN DOE, #2(DPO), Police Investigator, sued in individual and official capacity; JOHN DOE, DPO (Supervisor at scene), sued in individual a
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7785 ALONZO GREENE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, sued in individual and official capacity; R. C. SWARTZ, Durham County police officer sued in individual and official capacity; JOHN DOE, #1(DPO), Police Investigator, sued in individual and official capacity; JOHN DOE, #2(DPO), Police Investigator, sued in individual and official capacity; JOHN DOE, DPO (Supervisor at scene), sued in individual an..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7785
ALONZO GREENE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, sued in individual and
official capacity; R. C. SWARTZ, Durham County police officer
sued in individual and official capacity; JOHN DOE, #1(DPO),
Police Investigator, sued in individual and official
capacity; JOHN DOE, #2(DPO), Police Investigator, sued in
individual and official capacity; JOHN DOE, DPO (Supervisor
at scene), sued in individual and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00452-CCE-JEP)
Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alonzo Greene, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Martin Rehberg, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alonzo Greene appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Greene v. Durham Cnty. Police Dep’t, No. 1:13-cv-00452-
CCE-JEP (M.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2