Filed: Mar. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7885 JUSTIN COTE-STOKES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. S. G. SATTERTHWAITE, Norfolk Deputy, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01039-TSE-JFA) Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015 Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7885 JUSTIN COTE-STOKES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. S. G. SATTERTHWAITE, Norfolk Deputy, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01039-TSE-JFA) Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015 Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per c..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7885
JUSTIN COTE-STOKES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
S. G. SATTERTHWAITE, Norfolk Deputy,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-01039-TSE-JFA)
Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Justin Cote-Stokes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Justin Cote-Stokes appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for failing to
comply with the district court’s prior order directing Cote-
Stokes to provide the district court with: (1) evidence that he
fully exhausted his administrative remedies; and (2) a signed
consent to collection of fees from his prison trust account. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Cote-Stokes v. Satterthwaite, No. 1:14-cv-01039-TSE-JFA
(E.D. Va. Dec. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2