Filed: Aug. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1136 SYDNEY S. HART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JACOB J. LEW, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Defendant – Appellee, and DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:12-cv-03482-ELH) Submitted: June 19, 2015 Decided: August 19, 2015 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirm
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1136 SYDNEY S. HART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JACOB J. LEW, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Defendant – Appellee, and DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:12-cv-03482-ELH) Submitted: June 19, 2015 Decided: August 19, 2015 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirme..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1136
SYDNEY S. HART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JACOB J. LEW, U.S. Department of the Treasury,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-03482-ELH)
Submitted: June 19, 2015 Decided: August 19, 2015
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sydney S. Hart, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United
States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sydney S. Hart appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Jacob J. Lew, Secretary of the Treasury, on
Hart’s claims of sex discrimination and retaliation in violation
of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e
to 2000e–17 (2012), amended by Pub. L. No. 113-235, 128 Stat.
2130, 2537, 2537 (2014). This Court reviews de novo whether a
district court erred in granting summary judgment. Dulaney v.
Packaging Corp. of Am.,
673 F.3d 323, 330 (4th Cir. 2012). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hart v. Lew, No. 1:12-cv-03482-ELH (D. Md. filed Feb. 6,
2015 & entered Feb. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2