Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Scott Griffin v. Paul Walker, Jr., 15-1159 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-1159 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1159 SCOTT M. GRIFFIN, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. PAUL E. WALKER, JR.; CAROLINA SELF STORAGE CENTERS, INC., Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (2:13-cv-03186-RMG) Submitted: August 31, 2015 Decided: September 10, 2015 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1159 SCOTT M. GRIFFIN, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. PAUL E. WALKER, JR.; CAROLINA SELF STORAGE CENTERS, INC., Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (2:13-cv-03186-RMG) Submitted: August 31, 2015 Decided: September 10, 2015 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kathleen C. Barnes, BARNES LAW FIRM, LLC, Hampton, South Carolina, for Appellants. J. Calhoun Watson, SOWELL GRAY STEPP & LAFFITTE, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Paul E. Walker, Jr., and Carolina Self Storage Centers, Inc., appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Scott M. Griffin in Griffin’s breach-of- contract action and the order denying relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffin v. Walker, No. 2:13-cv-03186-RMG (D.S.C. Nov. 19, 2014; Nov. 20, 2014; Jan. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer