Filed: Jun. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1171 J.B.; LAURA BOUMA, on behalf of Son J.B., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. THE COUNTY OF HOWARD, IN MARYLAND; JUDGE TIMOTHY MCCRONE; JUDGE LENORE GELFMAN; JUDGE LOUIS BECKER; JUDGE WILLIAM TUCKER; ALISA CUMMINS, ESQ.; CHARLES RAND, ESQ., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:14-cv-03752-ELH) Submitted: June 25,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1171 J.B.; LAURA BOUMA, on behalf of Son J.B., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. THE COUNTY OF HOWARD, IN MARYLAND; JUDGE TIMOTHY MCCRONE; JUDGE LENORE GELFMAN; JUDGE LOUIS BECKER; JUDGE WILLIAM TUCKER; ALISA CUMMINS, ESQ.; CHARLES RAND, ESQ., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:14-cv-03752-ELH) Submitted: June 25, 2..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1171
J.B.; LAURA BOUMA, on behalf of Son J.B.,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
THE COUNTY OF HOWARD, IN MARYLAND; JUDGE TIMOTHY MCCRONE;
JUDGE LENORE GELFMAN; JUDGE LOUIS BECKER; JUDGE WILLIAM
TUCKER; ALISA CUMMINS, ESQ.; CHARLES RAND, ESQ.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-03752-ELH)
Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Laura Bouma, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants J.B. and Laura Bouma appeal the district court’s
order denying their motion for reconsideration of the court’s order
dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See J.B. v.
Cnty. of Howard, No. 1:14-cv-03752-ELH (D. Md. filed Jan. 21, 2015,
entered Jan. 22, 2015; Dec. 8, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2