Filed: Aug. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1382 CATANDRIA N. SOUBLET, Petitioner - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (No. 27242-14) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Catandria N. Soublet, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia McDonald Bowman, Trial Attorney, Bridget Maria Rowan, UNITED STA
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1382 CATANDRIA N. SOUBLET, Petitioner - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (No. 27242-14) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Catandria N. Soublet, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia McDonald Bowman, Trial Attorney, Bridget Maria Rowan, UNITED STAT..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1382 CATANDRIA N. SOUBLET, Petitioner - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (No. 27242-14) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Catandria N. Soublet, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia McDonald Bowman, Trial Attorney, Bridget Maria Rowan, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Catandria N. Soublet appeals from the tax court’s order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction her unsigned and unratified petition for redetermination of a deficiency with respect to her 2012 income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. See Soublet v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, T.C. No. 27242-14 (U.S.T.C. Apr. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
