Filed: Oct. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1794 In Re: MOHAMMAD HARRIS AMIN, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 19, 2015 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mohammad Harris Amin, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mohammad Harris Amin has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seek
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1794 In Re: MOHAMMAD HARRIS AMIN, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 19, 2015 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mohammad Harris Amin, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mohammad Harris Amin has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeki..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1794
In Re: MOHAMMAD HARRIS AMIN,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 19, 2015
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mohammad Harris Amin, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mohammad Harris Amin has filed a petition for a writ of
mandamus seeking an order directing the Loudoun County Circuit
Court and Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office to rule on a pending
probation violation. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and
should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v.
U.S. Dist. Court,
426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui,
333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further,
mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a
clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan
Ass’n,
860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). We lack jurisdiction
to grant mandamus relief against state officials. Gurley v.
Superior Court of Mecklenburg Cty.,
411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir.
1969) (per curiam).
Because Amin seeks a writ of mandamus against state
officials, we lack jurisdiction over his petition. Accordingly,
we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the
petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DISMISSED
2