Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Shirley Stewart v. James Dimon, 15-1898 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-1898 Visitors: 39
Filed: Dec. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1898 SHIRLEY ANN STEWART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES DIMON, The Chairman and CEO of J.P. Morgan Bank, N.A.; LELA AMES; JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01707-TSE-MSN) Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit J
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1898 SHIRLEY ANN STEWART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES DIMON, The Chairman and CEO of J.P. Morgan Bank, N.A.; LELA AMES; JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01707-TSE-MSN) Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shirley Ann Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey L. Tarkenton, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Shirley Ann Stewart appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her civil complaint and denying her motion for reconsideration. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart v. Dimon, No. 1:14-cv-01707-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 13, 2015 & entered Mar. 20, 2015; filed Apr. 3, 2015 & entered Apr. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer