In Re: Tony McManus v., 15-1919 (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: 15-1919
Visitors: 61
Filed: Dec. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1919 In Re: TONY WADDLE MCMANUS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:00-cr-00189-JAB-2; 1:11-cv-00103-JAB-JEP; 1:00-cr-00190-JAB-2) Submitted: December 1, 2015 Decided: December 14, 2015 Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tony Waddle McManus, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tony Waddle
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1919 In Re: TONY WADDLE MCMANUS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:00-cr-00189-JAB-2; 1:11-cv-00103-JAB-JEP; 1:00-cr-00190-JAB-2) Submitted: December 1, 2015 Decided: December 14, 2015 Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tony Waddle McManus, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tony Waddle M..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1919
In Re: TONY WADDLE MCMANUS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:00-cr-00189-JAB-2; 1:11-cv-00103-JAB-JEP;
1:00-cr-00190-JAB-2)
Submitted: December 1, 2015 Decided: December 14, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tony Waddle McManus, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tony Waddle McManus petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act. Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the district court has issued its
final order and judgment on the § 2255 motion. Accordingly,
because the district court has recently decided McManus’ case,
we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Source: CourtListener