In Re: Jerry Sharpe v., 15-2303 (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: 15-2303
Filed: Dec. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2303 In re: JERRY WAYNE SHARPE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:14-ct-03269-F) Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Wayne Sharpe, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jerry Wayne Sharpe petitions fo
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2303 In re: JERRY WAYNE SHARPE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:14-ct-03269-F) Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Wayne Sharpe, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jerry Wayne Sharpe petitions for..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2303 In re: JERRY WAYNE SHARPE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:14-ct-03269-F) Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Wayne Sharpe, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jerry Wayne Sharpe petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for release pending appeal. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition and the amended mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITIONS DENIED 2
Source: CourtListener
