Filed: Mar. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6053 THOMAS MONIQUE BRADDY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ERIC WILSON, Warden, CEO; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX LOW PETERSBURG; BUREAU OF PRISONS, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:14-cv-00606-HEH) Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Jud
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6053 THOMAS MONIQUE BRADDY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ERIC WILSON, Warden, CEO; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX LOW PETERSBURG; BUREAU OF PRISONS, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:14-cv-00606-HEH) Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judg..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6053 THOMAS MONIQUE BRADDY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ERIC WILSON, Warden, CEO; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX LOW PETERSBURG; BUREAU OF PRISONS, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:14-cv-00606-HEH) Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Monique Braddy, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas Monique Braddy, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his breach of contract suit as frivolous and as barred by Appellees’ sovereign immunity. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Braddy v. Wilson, No. 3:14-cv-00606-HEH (E.D. Va. Dec. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
