Filed: May 27, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6276 RONNIE ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KEN STOLLEY, Sheriff of VBCC; CPL. FOWLER, Intel Office of VBCC; CPL. WINN, Classification Officer of VBCC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:14-cv-00780-HEH-RCY) Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 27, 2015 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Aff
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6276 RONNIE ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KEN STOLLEY, Sheriff of VBCC; CPL. FOWLER, Intel Office of VBCC; CPL. WINN, Classification Officer of VBCC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:14-cv-00780-HEH-RCY) Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 27, 2015 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6276
RONNIE ANDERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KEN STOLLEY, Sheriff of VBCC; CPL. FOWLER, Intel Office of
VBCC; CPL. WINN, Classification Officer of VBCC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:14-cv-00780-HEH-RCY)
Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 27, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ronnie Anderson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil
action for failure to comply with a court order. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Anderson v. Stolley, No. 3:14-cv-00780-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Jan.
30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2