Filed: Jun. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6394 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRONE LAMONT SMITH, a/k/a Blue, a/k/a Tyrone Eady, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, District Judge. (3:94-cr-00041-JPJ-1) Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015 Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6394 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRONE LAMONT SMITH, a/k/a Blue, a/k/a Tyrone Eady, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, District Judge. (3:94-cr-00041-JPJ-1) Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015 Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opini..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6394
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TYRONE LAMONT SMITH, a/k/a Blue, a/k/a Tyrone Eady,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, District
Judge. (3:94-cr-00041-JPJ-1)
Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Lamont Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey,
Assistant United States Attorney, Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Lamont Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for a sentence reduction under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual
§ 4B1.1(b). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2