Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Charlie Jones v. Eric Wilson, 15-6445 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-6445 Visitors: 37
Filed: Jul. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6445 CHARLIE LOUIS JONES, Petitioner – Appellant, v. ERIC WILSON, Respondent – Appellee, and PETERSBURG FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-00020-CMH-IDD) Submitted: July 7, 2015 Decided: July 13, 2015 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judg
More
                              UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                              No. 15-6445


CHARLIE LOUIS JONES,

                Petitioner – Appellant,

          v.

ERIC WILSON,

                Respondent – Appellee,

          and

PETERSBURG FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX,

                Respondent.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.    Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00020-CMH-IDD)


Submitted:   July 7, 2015                    Decided:    July 13, 2015


Before MOTZ and    GREGORY,    Circuit   Judges,   and   DAVIS,   Senior
Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Charlie Louis Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.




                                2
PER CURIAM:

     Charlie    Louis    Jones,      a   federal      prisoner,      appeals      the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2012)   petition.       We   have   reviewed        the    record   and   find   no

reversible error.       Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.        Jones v. Wilson, No. 1:14-cv-00020-CMH-

IDD (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2015).                We grant leave to proceed in

forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before   this   court   and   argument       would    not    aid   the   decisional

process.

                                                                           AFFIRMED




                                         3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer