Filed: Aug. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6476 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LUCIEN ANTONIO ROBERTS, a/k/a Lou, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (4:99-cr-00021-RBS-4) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. L
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-6476 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LUCIEN ANTONIO ROBERTS, a/k/a Lou, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (4:99-cr-00021-RBS-4) Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lu..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6476
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LUCIEN ANTONIO ROBERTS, a/k/a Lou,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:99-cr-00021-RBS-4)
Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lucien Antonio Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Cross,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, William David Muhr,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Howard
Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lucien Antonio Roberts appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for modification of sentence, 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Roberts, No.
4:99-cr-00021-RBS-4 (E.D. Va. Mar. 11, 2015). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2